<%@LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="65001"%> Untitled Document

trinity

A DISCUSSION OF THE ORTHODOX

PERCEPTION OF THE NATURE OF GOD

 

This talk was presented by Steve Rodakis as part of a seminar on the Church Fathers.

 

    As a beginning premise, we shall state that the nature of God is a mystery.  We cannot completely understand it,  nor do we seek to delve into the mind of our Creator.   The revealing of the Holy Trinity through scripture and the Incarnation of Jesus Christ has given us some perspectives concerning the attributes of God, however, and by relying on the writings the Fathers of the Church have left us, we can discuss these qualities.

    In discussing the nature of God, only Orthodox Christians make the distinction between His “essence” and his “energies”.  God’s essence (ousia), according to the Fathers, is that which defines His being, and it is a mystery to man.  We cannot know it.  His energies are His acts or operations in Creation, and those are revealed to us by the legacy of sacred persons to whom He has spoken,  by inspired scripture, and above all, by the incarnation, teaching, life, death, resurrection, and continuing presence through the Church and its sacraments of His Son, the Logos, Jesus Christ. 

    Some of the reasoning which led the Church Fathers to this difficult concept may be summarized in the following:

    Though God is transcendent—apart from being and non-being—He is not cut off from His Creation.  All of man’s relationship in the Judeo/Christian tradition with his Creator teaches him that God is approachable.  To quote the prayer to the Holy Spirit, “…Who are everywhere present and fills all things…”

    How, then do we reconcile God’s seeming remoteness in our ignorance of His nature with His accessibility which we accept as His children and inheritors of His grace?

    St. Gregory Palamas, writing in the fourteenth century, but echoing the thoughts of Orthodox Fathers from ages past, particularly St. Dionysios the Areopagite, enunciated most clearly the distinction between God’s essence and his energies.  Of God’s essence, St. Gregory spoke in negative terms, that is,  of what we do not know.  Of His energies, he was more specific.  Consider these notions:

     The Christian West, which tries so hard to define all aspects of God and man, misses this distinction of essence and energies.  The West defines sin as a violation of a legal relationship between God and man, and the church’s role is to inflict punishment as a means of correcting and healing the violation.  The Christian East sees sin as a loss of the substance of the image of God,  which is restorable through grace.  Redemption from sin is a fulfillment of man’s image, the potential for union with God is always present, waiting to be resurrected. 

    As a result of this difference in theological approach, the West fell into such errors as purgatory, the hoarding of surplus grace and its dispensing by the hierarchy, and other abuses that flowed from such flawed thinking.

    St. Paul urges us to “become partakers in the Divine nature…”.  It is one of the many references used by the Fathers in formulating the doctrine of theosis, or “deification”, as man’s goal in his spiritual journey. The partaking of which St. Paul speaks is understood by Orthodox as participating in God’s energies.

    All energy (or action) originates with the Father, being communicated eternally by the Son, through the Holy Spirit.  By becoming partakers in God’s nature by grace, we can become all that God is by nature, except for the identity of that nature.  We remain creatures—created beings—while becoming deified by God’s grace just as Christ remained God in becoming man through the Incarnation, which was itself an act of grace. 

    If we understand the core of the distinction between God’s essence and His energies, we can more completely appreciate St. Athanasios famous teaching,  that  “God became man that man may become God.”